Self-exclusion-uk-insights | February 2024
what benefits am i entitled to

What Is Self-Exclusion in the UK? Myths vs. Reality

Gambling offers many a sense of thrill and enjoyment, but for a subset of individuals, it spirals into a detrimental issue affecting their health, finances, social relationships, and overall well-being. Problem gambling is characterized by its harmful effects on the gambler and others in their vicinity. The Gambling Commission reports that around 340,000 problem gamblers exist in Great Britain, with many more teetering on the brink of developing a gambling disorder.

One constructive approach problem gamblers use to curb their behaviour is self-exclusion. This voluntary mechanism empowers gamblers to restrict their access to gambling venues or online platforms, including casino websites not on Gamstop, for a predetermined duration. Nonetheless, a cloud of myths and misconceptions surround self-exclusion, often discouraging its potential users or leading to misunderstandings about its pros and cons. In this article, we aim to demystify self-exclusion, elucidate how it operates in the UK, and shine a light on prevalent myths and the realities they overshadow.

Self-Exclusion: A Definition and a Solution

Self-exclusion is a tool that can help gamblers who want to stop or limit their gambling behaviour. It is not a treatment or a cure for gambling addiction, but rather a form of harm reduction that can support gamblers in their recovery journey. Self-exclusion can be seen as a commitment or a contract that gamblers make with themselves and with the gambling operators to stay away from gambling opportunities for a certain period of time.

Benefits of Self-Exclusion for Problem Gamblers

Self-exclusion can have many benefits for problem gamblers, both psychologically and financially. Some of the benefits are:

Psychological and Financial Advantages

  • Taking a self-exclusion route assists gamblers in interrupting their habitual patterns, minimising encounters with potential temptations.
  • By committing to this break, individuals can conserve funds and steer clear of accumulating debts due to excessive gambling activities.
  • The decision to step back from gambling can significantly promote mental wellness, alleviating the feelings of stress and guilt often linked to these activities.
  • This action can boost an individual’s confidence, showcasing their determination to manage and control their gambling tendencies.
  • Building a distance from gambling activities can foster healthier social ties and familial bonds by curtailing the disputes and mistrust that these activities often bring about.

Enhanced Control Over Impulsive Behaviour

  • Committing to a pause in gambling refines one’s decision-making abilities, allowing them to contemplate actions and repercussions.
  • During this period, individuals can discover alternative activities and pastimes, offering a different source of recreation.
  • Furthermore, it serves as a gateway for seeking additional avenues for support, such as counselling or participation in support groups, addressing the deeper issues tied to their tendencies.

Common Myths Surrounding Self-Exclusion

Despite the benefits of self-exclusion, there are also some myths and misconceptions that may deter gamblers from using this option or undermine its effectiveness. Some of the common myths are:

Myth 1: Self-Exclusion is Permanent

Some gamblers may mistakenly believe that once they opt for self-exclusion, they are making an irrevocable commitment that bars them from all future gambling activities. However, according to a BBC report on the rise of self-exclusion in response to the growth of online betting, this is not the case. Self-exclusion is a flexible tool, allowing gamblers to set their exclusion period ranging from 6 months to 5 years. Additionally, gamblers have the freedom to review and, if necessary, modify their self-exclusion agreements, depending on their evolving circumstances and views on gambling. Importantly, opting for self-exclusion does not impede a gambler’s legal rights or responsibilities, including those related to taxation or claiming of winnings.

Myth 2: Registering for One Means Exclusion from All Gambling Venues

Some gamblers may think that registering for one self-exclusion scheme means that they will be automatically excluded from all forms of gambling in the UK. This is not true. There are different types of self-exclusion schemes that cover different platforms or venues, such as online gambling sites, casinos, betting shops, bingo halls, arcades, or lotteries. Gamblers need to register separately for each scheme that they want to join, and they need to provide personal details and a photo to confirm their identity and prevent them from accessing the premises or accounts. However, there are also some multi-operator self-exclusion schemes that allow gamblers to exclude themselves from multiple venues or operators within the same sector with one registration.

Myth 3: Breaking a Self-Exclusion Agreement Carries No Consequences

Contrary to what some might believe, breaching a self-exclusion agreement isn’t a simple act without repercussions. In reality, violating this agreement constitutes a breach of contract, with potential legal and financial consequences for both the gambler and the operator. Should a person attempt to enter a venue or log into an account from which they’ve self-excluded, they could be asked to depart or find their account terminated. Engaging in gambling during a self-exclusion period could result in the forfeiture of winnings and liability for any damages stemming from their gambling actions. Additionally, violating such an agreement might exacerbate feelings of guilt, shame, and frustration, diminishing the individual’s drive and assurance in their journey to abstain from gambling.

How Self-Exclusion Works in the UK

The UK boasts a detailed and well-regulated self-exclusion framework designed to safeguard and assist those grappling with gambling issues. Depending on their gambling preferences, individuals can opt from a range of self-exclusion programmes. Key schemes include:

  • GAMSTOP: Serving as the primary online self-exclusion system, GAMSTOP encompasses a majority of the UK’s online gambling websites. Upon free registration, individuals can decide on their exclusion duration, ranging from half a year up to five years. Once a part of GAMSTOP, accessing existing or setting up new accounts on affiliated online gambling sites becomes impossible. Furthermore, individuals can choose to be excluded from promotional content from online gambling entities.
  • SENSE: Tailored for casinos, SENSE operates as a widespread self-exclusion platform in the UK. Once gamblers sign up at no charge, they get to dictate their exclusion period, similar to GAMSTOP. Post-registration, entry into any affiliated casino is prohibited. For those seeking guidance, SENSE centres and their online platforms house trained professionals ready to assist.
  • MOSES: Designed specifically for UK betting outlets, MOSES offers a comprehensive self-exclusion system. With free enrolment, gamblers can predefine their exclusion time frame. Upon registration, members are restricted from accessing any associated betting store within a designated region. Support and information can be sought either directly from MOSES personnel or through their online presence.

Challenges and Limitations of the Self-Exclusion System

Whilst the UK’s self-exclusion system offers a myriad of advantages for those struggling with gambling, there remain certain challenges and limitations that warrant attention. A few of these challenges include:

  • Awareness and Accessibility: A number of gamblers might be oblivious to the existence or the ease of access to self-exclusion schemes. There’s a pressing requirement for enhanced education around self-exclusion as a tangible option for those battling gambling tendencies, coupled with more intuitive methods to enrol and manage such agreements.
  • Consistency and Coordination: For some, navigating through the multitude of self-exclusion schemes, each catering to diverse platforms or venues, can be perplexing. There’s a clear need for greater uniformity and collaboration amongst these schemes, potentially introducing a centralised point of contact or a comprehensive registration system that encompasses all gambling facets within the UK.
  • Enforcement and Compliance: There are instances where gamblers might stumble upon gaps, allowing them to sidestep their self-exclusion commitments—be it via alternate devices, identities or payment avenues. It becomes imperative, then, to institute robust mechanisms that can diligently monitor and authenticate the activities of those who have opted for self-exclusion. Further, there should be transparent and stringent repercussions for any breaches of such agreements.
  • Support and Aftercare: Post-registration for self-exclusion, some gamblers may feel a sense of isolation or believe that the commitment to abstain is a Herculean task. It’s essential to offer an extended arm of support for these individuals, be it in the form of counselling, therapeutic sessions, medicinal aid or self-help congregations. Additionally, continuous feedback, motivation, and incentives can play a pivotal role in ensuring the longevity of their self-exclusion commitments.

The Future of Self-Exclusion in the UK: Potential Reforms and Enhancements

Self-exclusion remains a pivotal and effective strategy for UK problem gamblers, assisting them in curtailing or halting their gambling tendencies. Nevertheless, with the advent of diverse gaming options at non-Gamstop casinos, it becomes essential to contemplate advancements and refinements within the self-exclusion paradigm. Here are potential enhancements:

  • Broadening the Self-exclusion Horizon: Current self-exclusion schemes might benefit from encompassing gambling facets not presently included—like social gambling, gaming or loot boxes, and other activities that mimic gambling. Making these schemes more accessible to various demographic sections, including the youth, women, ethnic minorities, and individuals with disabilities, is also vital.
  • Augmenting the Quality of Self-exclusion Initiatives: Drawing from global best practices could significantly refine our self-exclusion systems. This might mean introducing a unified database, a singular registration procedure, or even adopting biometric verifications. New tech interventions—like artificial intelligence, blockchain, or geolocation tools—could further bolster the efficacy of these schemes by identifying and thwarting problematic gambling.
  • Harmonising Self-exclusion with Additional Interventions: Integrating self-exclusion with other helpful tools can provide a more holistic support structure. Online tools, apps, or platforms offering self-evaluation and management resources can be woven into the self-exclusion fabric. Simultaneously, aligning these schemes with services addressing broader concerns of problem gamblers—like financial counselling or mental health assistance—can be invaluable.

While self-exclusion stands as a commendable pathway for those aiming to regain control over their gambling behaviours, it isn’t a panacea. Effective self-exclusion hinges on the individual’s dedication and the operator’s adherence, augmented by professional guidance and familial support. Rather than viewing self-exclusion as an endpoint, it’s more apt to see it as the commencement of a transformative journey towards renewed well-being.

Disclaimer: Please be aware that this site is no longer under active management. As a result, we cannot assure the accuracy or relevance of the content provided. Visitors should use their discretion and consider the potential for outdated or inaccurate information before relying on any material found here.

Disclaimer: Please be aware that this site is no longer under active management. As a result, we cannot assure the accuracy or relevance of the content provided. Visitors should use their discretion and consider the potential for outdated or inaccurate information before relying on any material found here.